[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <960effc4-6cb4-40a3-a980-3a15b44cefad@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 23:39:06 +0000
From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
To: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>, David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
<hawk@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>, Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>,
Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 06/20] net: page_pool: add a mp hook to
unregister_netdevice*
On 1/6/25 21:44, Mina Almasry wrote:
...
>> diff --git a/include/net/page_pool/types.h b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
>> index a473ea0c48c4..140fec6857c6 100644
>> --- a/include/net/page_pool/types.h
>> +++ b/include/net/page_pool/types.h
>> @@ -152,12 +152,15 @@ struct page_pool_stats {
>> */
>> #define PAGE_POOL_FRAG_GROUP_ALIGN (4 * sizeof(long))
>>
>> +struct netdev_rx_queue;
>> +
>> struct memory_provider_ops {
>> netmem_ref (*alloc_netmems)(struct page_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp);
>> bool (*release_netmem)(struct page_pool *pool, netmem_ref netmem);
>> int (*init)(struct page_pool *pool);
>> void (*destroy)(struct page_pool *pool);
>> int (*nl_report)(const struct page_pool *pool, struct sk_buff *rsp);
>> + void (*uninstall)(void *mp_priv, struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq);
>
> nit: the other params take struct page_pool *pool as input, and find
> the mp_priv in there if they need, it may be nice for consistency to
> continue to pass the entire pool to these ops.
I think so as well, but there is simply no page pool to pass
from where it's called.
> AFAIU this is the first added non-mandatory op, right? Please specify
> it as so, maybe something like:
>
> /* optional: called when the memory provider is uninstalled from the
> netdev_rx_queue due to the interface going down or otherwise. The
> memory provider may perform whatever cleanup necessary here if it
> needs to. */
>
>> };
>>
>> struct pp_memory_provider_params {
>> diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
>> index c7f3dea3e0eb..aa082770ab1c 100644
>> --- a/net/core/dev.c
>> +++ b/net/core/dev.c
>> @@ -11464,6 +11464,19 @@ void unregister_netdevice_queue(struct net_device *dev, struct list_head *head)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_netdevice_queue);
>>
>> +static void dev_memory_provider_uninstall(struct net_device *dev)
>> +{
>> + unsigned int i;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < dev->real_num_rx_queues; i++) {
>> + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxq = &dev->_rx[i];
>> + struct pp_memory_provider_params *p = &rxq->mp_params;
>> +
>> + if (p->mp_ops && p->mp_ops->uninstall)
>
> Previous versions of the code checked p->mp_priv to check if the queue
> is mp enabled or not, I guess you check mp_ops and that is set/cleared
The patchset converts it all to mp_ops (v9 missed one place), which is the
right thing to do as only ops are typed and strictly defined.
--
Pavel Begunkov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists