netdev - Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests/bpf: Migrate test_xdp_redirect.sh to xdp_do

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <bd6f77d6-17b4-41fc-b906-13c56f3fb753@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2025 09:24:43 +0100
From: Bastien Curutchet <bastien.curutchet@...tlin.com>
To: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>,
 Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
 John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
 Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau
 <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
 Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
 KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
 Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
 Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests/bpf: Migrate test_xdp_redirect.sh to
 xdp_do_redirect.c

Hi again,

On 1/3/25 2:17 PM, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
> On 1/3/25 11:10, Bastien Curutchet (eBPF Foundation) wrote:
>> test_xdp_redirect.sh can't be used by the BPF CI.
> 
>> +	dummy_prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(skel_dummy->obj, "xdp_dummy_prog");
> Also missed this one: why not using directly skel_dummy->progs.xdp_dummy_prog ?
> (same for all progs below)
> 

Indeed, that would be more straightforward

Thanks,
Bastien