netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH v8 4/6] octeontx2-pf: CN20K mbox REQ/ACK implementation for NIC PF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <BY3PR18MB4707A2342DA89BB8F556A278A0112@BY3PR18MB4707.namprd18.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 06:55:23 +0000
From: Sai Krishna Gajula <saikrishnag@...vell.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v8 4/6] octeontx2-pf: CN20K mbox REQ/ACK
 implementation for NIC PF

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 2:24 AM
> To: Sai Krishna Gajula <saikrishnag@...vell.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v8 4/6] octeontx2-pf: CN20K mbox
> REQ/ACK implementation for NIC PF
> 
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 13: 08: 29 +0000 Sai Krishna Gajula wrote: > I have
> pushed V8 patchset for CN20k mbox module yesterday, as the > previous
> version got deferred due to winter holidays. > > We see below warning/error
> message for patch 
> On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 13:08:29 +0000 Sai Krishna Gajula wrote:
> > I have pushed V8 patchset for CN20k mbox module yesterday, as the
> > previous version got deferred due to winter holidays.
> >
> > We see below warning/error message for patch 4 when compiled with
> > clang options. "netdev/build_clang	fail	Errors and
> > warnings before: 162 this patch: 163"
> 
> It's a known problem :( Unfortunately one of the core headers (linux/mm.h,
> IIRC) generates a warning when build with latest clang, so we get false positive
> failures. Hopefully this will be fixed during the 6.14 merge window.
> 
> If your patches are still in an active state in patchwork no action is required on
> your side.
> 
> Adding back the list, please avoid removing CCs.

Ack, Thanks Jakub for the confirmation. 

Regards,
Sai