[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a5beb529-5769-4310-b6a4-0ddccd85caf1@lunn.ch>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 14:26:32 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Eric Woudstra <ericwouds@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, bridge@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: phylink: always config mac for
(delayed) phy
> The PCS doesn't support in-band status in 2500Base-X mode, or at least
> the implementation isn't compatible with those RealTek PHYs.
Is one or the other not actually 2500Base-X, but SGMII over clocked?
Overclocked SGMII cannot do in-band signalling. It could well be the
PCS is 2500BaseX, but the PHY is over clocked SGMII, and so the PCS is
not seeing the in-band signalling it expects, so never reports link.
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists