lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <677d8f3618080_2821742942a@willemb.c.googlers.com.notmuch>
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2025 15:31:50 -0500
From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, 
 Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, 
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
 edumazet@...gle.com, 
 pabeni@...hat.com, 
 stable@...r.kernel.org, 
 jdamato@...tly.com, 
 almasrymina@...gle.com, 
 amritha.nambiar@...el.com, 
 sridhar.samudrala@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] netdev: prevent accessing NAPI instances from another
 namespace

Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jan 2025 08:10:36 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > +/* must be called under rcu_read_lock(), as we dont take a reference */  
> > 
> > Instead of function comments, invariant checks in code?
> > 
> > Like in dev_get_by_napi_id:
> > 
> >         WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());
> 
> Can I do it as a follow up? Adding the warning to napi_by_id()
> reveals that napi_hash_add() currently walks the list without
> holding the RCU lock :)

Ah I should have noticed that :) Of course, or ignore in this case
then.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ