[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXJAmzt3xypxdM7=6LSQL7rn++mv-033CLcw3LGS0PxCV8d5A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2025 13:58:07 -0800
From: John Ousterhout <ouster@...stanford.edu>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
horms@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 06/12] net: homa: create homa_peer.h and homa_peer.c
On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 1:24 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2025 22:02:25 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > While you are at it, I suggest you test your patch with LOCKDEP enabled,
> > and CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP=y
> >
> > Using GFP_KERNEL while BH are blocked is not good.
>
> In fact splice all of kernel/configs/debug.config into your
> testing config.
Will do. Does "splice" mean anything more than copying
kernel/configs/debug.config onto the end of my .config file?
Is there general advice available on managing multiple configs? Sounds
like I'll need different configs for development/validation and
performance testing.
-John-
Powered by blists - more mailing lists