[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABAhCOR7Y058pDUKBOQ6vDeEZkHYQqeyg97nrBYoJHqkFgDd7w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 16:55:16 +0800
From: Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@...il.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>, Harald Welte <laforge@...monks.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 net 2/3] gtp: Destroy device along with udp socket's
netns dismantle.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2025 at 2:29 PM Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com> wrote:
[...]
> @@ -2480,6 +2480,11 @@ static void __net_exit gtp_net_exit_batch_rtnl(struct list_head *net_list,
> list_for_each_entry(net, net_list, exit_list) {
> struct gtp_net *gn = net_generic(net, gtp_net_id);
> struct gtp_dev *gtp, *gtp_next;
> + struct net_device *dev;
> +
> + for_each_netdev(net, dev)
> + if (dev->rtnl_link_ops == >p_link_ops)
> + gtp_dellink(dev, dev_to_kill);
I'm not sure, but do we usually have to clean up devices
in the netns being deleted? Seems default_device_ops
can handle it.
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(gtp, gtp_next, &gn->gtp_dev_list, list)
> gtp_dellink(gtp->dev, dev_to_kill);
> --
> 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists