[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z35OaQDLS_i2uL_b@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 10:07:37 +0000
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 02/18] net: stmmac: move tx_lpi_timer
tracking to phylib
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 03:36:57PM +0800, Choong Yong Liang wrote:
> I have completed the sanity test on the EEE changes to the stmmac driver.
>
> It seems that most of the changes are acceptable with respect to EEE behavior.
>
> However, I noticed that this part of the code requires a minor change to fix
> the logic:
>
> /* Configure phylib's copy of the LPI timer */
> if (phylink_ethtool_get_eee(priv->phylink, &eee) == 0) {
> eee.tx_lpi_timer = priv->tx_lpi_timer;
> phylink_ethtool_set_eee(priv->phylink, &eee);
> }
>
> Otherwise, the "tx_lpi_timer" will not be set correctly during the initial
> state.
>
> Tested-by: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks for testing. I can't update the series as there has been a power
failure at home, hence the machine that has my git trees on is
inaccessible at the moment.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists