[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3ddc0625-15ea-4010-a830-21020569d685@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 18:58:28 +0800
From: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 02/18] net: stmmac: move tx_lpi_timer tracking
to phylib
On 8/1/2025 6:40 pm, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 03:36:57PM +0800, Choong Yong Liang wrote:
>> Tested-by: Choong Yong Liang <yong.liang.choong@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Please let me know if this is for the entire series.
>
> Thanks.
>
Yes, the test is for the entire series.
The only issue that was discovered is that during the initial state, the
"tx_lpi_timer" is not set correctly.
The "tx_lpi_timer" with a value of 0 causes the EEE to be unable to enter
LPI mode.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists