[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68e23536-5295-4ae0-94c9-691a74339de0@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2025 12:33:00 +0100
From: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc: Wei Huang <wei.huang2@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, helgaas@...nel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com,
asml.silence@...il.com, almasrymina@...gle.com, gospo@...adcom.com,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com,
somnath.kotur@...adcom.com, andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com,
manoj.panicker2@....com, Eric.VanTassell@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 1/2] bnxt_en: Add TPH support in BNXT driver
On 15. 11. 24, 23:04, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:04:11 -0600 Wei Huang wrote:
>> +static void bnxt_irq_affinity_release(struct kref __always_unused *ref)
>
> unused? you're using it now
>
>> +{
>> + struct irq_affinity_notify *notify =
>> + (struct irq_affinity_notify *)
>> + container_of(ref, struct irq_affinity_notify, kref);
>
> this is ugly, and cast is unnecessary.
>
>> + struct bnxt_irq *irq;
>> +
>> + irq = container_of(notify, struct bnxt_irq, affinity_notify);
>
> since you init irq out of line you can as well init notify here
>
>> + if (pcie_tph_set_st_entry(irq->bp->pdev, irq->msix_nr, 0)) {
>
> You checked this function can sleep, right? Because rtnl_lock()
> will sleep.
Based on the above, I assume a new version was expected, but I cannot
find any. So, Wei Huang, what's the status of this?
thanks,
--
js
suse labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists