netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 21/29] crypto: s390/aes-gcm - use the new scatterwalk functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cdcf7da3766aa6f6336f590bd64c12cf@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Jan 2025 16:06:20 +0100
From: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Holger Dengler <dengler@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/29] crypto: s390/aes-gcm - use the new scatterwalk
 functions

On 2024-12-30 01:14, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> 
> Use scatterwalk_next() which consolidates scatterwalk_clamp() and
> scatterwalk_map().  Use scatterwalk_done_src() and
> scatterwalk_done_dst() which consolidate scatterwalk_unmap(),
> scatterwalk_advance(), and scatterwalk_done().
> 
> Besides the new functions being a bit easier to use, this is necessary
> because scatterwalk_done() is planned to be removed.
> 
> Cc: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Holger Dengler <dengler@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: linux-s390@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
> ---
> 
> This patch is part of a long series touching many files, so I have
> limited the Cc list on the full series.  If you want the full series 
> and
> did not receive it, please retrieve it from lore.kernel.org.
> 
>  arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c | 33 +++++++++++++--------------------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c
> index 9c46b1b630b1..7fd303df05ab 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c
> @@ -785,32 +785,25 @@ static void gcm_walk_start(struct gcm_sg_walk
> *gw, struct scatterlist *sg,
>  	scatterwalk_start(&gw->walk, sg);
>  }
> 
>  static inline unsigned int _gcm_sg_clamp_and_map(struct gcm_sg_walk 
> *gw)
>  {
> -	struct scatterlist *nextsg;
> -
> -	gw->walk_bytes = scatterwalk_clamp(&gw->walk, gw->walk_bytes_remain);
> -	while (!gw->walk_bytes) {
> -		nextsg = sg_next(gw->walk.sg);
> -		if (!nextsg)
> -			return 0;
> -		scatterwalk_start(&gw->walk, nextsg);
> -		gw->walk_bytes = scatterwalk_clamp(&gw->walk,
> -						   gw->walk_bytes_remain);
> -	}
> -	gw->walk_ptr = scatterwalk_map(&gw->walk);
> +	if (gw->walk_bytes_remain == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +	gw->walk_ptr = scatterwalk_next(&gw->walk, gw->walk_bytes_remain,
> +					&gw->walk_bytes);
>  	return gw->walk_bytes;
>  }
> 
>  static inline void _gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(struct gcm_sg_walk *gw,
> -					     unsigned int nbytes)
> +					     unsigned int nbytes, bool out)
>  {
>  	gw->walk_bytes_remain -= nbytes;
> -	scatterwalk_unmap(gw->walk_ptr);
> -	scatterwalk_advance(&gw->walk, nbytes);
> -	scatterwalk_done(&gw->walk, 0, gw->walk_bytes_remain);
> +	if (out)
> +		scatterwalk_done_dst(&gw->walk, gw->walk_ptr, nbytes);
> +	else
> +		scatterwalk_done_src(&gw->walk, gw->walk_ptr, nbytes);
>  	gw->walk_ptr = NULL;
>  }
> 
>  static int gcm_in_walk_go(struct gcm_sg_walk *gw, unsigned int 
> minbytesneeded)
>  {
> @@ -842,11 +835,11 @@ static int gcm_in_walk_go(struct gcm_sg_walk
> *gw, unsigned int minbytesneeded)
> 
>  	while (1) {
>  		n = min(gw->walk_bytes, AES_BLOCK_SIZE - gw->buf_bytes);
>  		memcpy(gw->buf + gw->buf_bytes, gw->walk_ptr, n);
>  		gw->buf_bytes += n;
> -		_gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(gw, n);
> +		_gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(gw, n, false);
>  		if (gw->buf_bytes >= minbytesneeded) {
>  			gw->ptr = gw->buf;
>  			gw->nbytes = gw->buf_bytes;
>  			goto out;
>  		}
> @@ -902,11 +895,11 @@ static int gcm_in_walk_done(struct gcm_sg_walk
> *gw, unsigned int bytesdone)
>  			memmove(gw->buf, gw->buf + bytesdone, n);
>  			gw->buf_bytes = n;
>  		} else
>  			gw->buf_bytes = 0;
>  	} else
> -		_gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(gw, bytesdone);
> +		_gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(gw, bytesdone, false);
> 
>  	return bytesdone;
>  }
> 
>  static int gcm_out_walk_done(struct gcm_sg_walk *gw, unsigned int 
> bytesdone)
> @@ -920,14 +913,14 @@ static int gcm_out_walk_done(struct gcm_sg_walk
> *gw, unsigned int bytesdone)
>  		for (i = 0; i < bytesdone; i += n) {
>  			if (!_gcm_sg_clamp_and_map(gw))
>  				return i;
>  			n = min(gw->walk_bytes, bytesdone - i);
>  			memcpy(gw->walk_ptr, gw->buf + i, n);
> -			_gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(gw, n);
> +			_gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(gw, n, true);
>  		}
>  	} else
> -		_gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(gw, bytesdone);
> +		_gcm_sg_unmap_and_advance(gw, bytesdone, true);
> 
>  	return bytesdone;
>  }
> 
>  static int gcm_aes_crypt(struct aead_request *req, unsigned int flags)

Reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>
Tested-by:  Harald Freudenberger <freude@...ux.ibm.com>