netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: net: ti: Adds device tree binding for DUAL-EMAC mode support on PRU-ICSS2 for AM57xx SOCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7870d1e4-074f-4dc5-aae5-ac5fc725cc43@lunn.ch>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:02:49 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Basharath Hussain Khaja <basharath@...thit.com>
Cc: danishanwar@...com, rogerq@...nel.org, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, nm@...com, ssantosh@...nel.org,
	tony@...mide.com, richardcochran@...il.com, parvathi@...thit.com,
	schnelle@...ux.ibm.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
	diogo.ivo@...mens.com, m-karicheri2@...com, horms@...nel.org,
	jacob.e.keller@...el.com, m-malladi@...com,
	javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com, afd@...com, s-anna@...com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, pratheesh@...com, prajith@...com,
	vigneshr@...com, praneeth@...com, srk@...com, rogerq@...com,
	krishna@...thit.com, pmohan@...thit.com, mohan@...thit.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/10] dt-bindings: net: ti: Adds device tree binding
 for DUAL-EMAC mode support on PRU-ICSS2 for AM57xx SOCs

> +          ti,no-half-duplex:
> +            type: boolean
> +            description:
> +              Disable half duplex operation on ICSSM MII port.

I already asked this in the next patch, but why have this property? Is
it because the hardware is broken? Or is this some sort of policy?
Policy should not be in DT, DT describes the hardware, not the policy
of how you use the hardware.

	Andrew