[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250109080758.608e6e1a@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 08:07:58 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Jonathan
Corbet <corbet@....net>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Simon Horman
<horms@...nel.org>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Maxime Chevallier
<maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 2/7] net: ethtool: plumb PHY stats to PHY
drivers
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:44:52 +0100 Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> +static inline void phy_ethtool_get_phy_stats(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + struct ethtool_eth_phy_stats *phy_stats,
> + struct ethtool_phy_stats *phydev_stats)
> +{
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + if (!phylib_stubs)
> + return;
> +
> + phylib_stubs->get_phy_stats(phydev, phy_stats, phydev_stats);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void phy_ethtool_get_link_ext_stats(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + struct ethtool_link_ext_stats *link_stats)
> +{
> + ASSERT_RTNL();
> +
> + if (!phylib_stubs)
> + return;
> +
> + phylib_stubs->get_link_ext_stats(phydev, link_stats);
> +}
So we traded on set of static inlines for another?
What's wrong with adding a C source which is always built in?
Like drivers/net/phy/stubs.c, maybe call it drivers/net/phy/accessors.c
or drivers/net/phy/helpers.c
Powered by blists - more mailing lists