[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250109233647.7d063fa2@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 23:36:47 +0100
From: Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Oleksij Rempel
<o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Donald Hunter
<donald.hunter@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Liam Girdwood
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Swenson <kyle.swenson@....tech>, Dent
Project <dentproject@...uxfoundation.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de, Maxime
Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/15] net: pse-pd: Add support for PSE
device index
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 19:59:20 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 11:51:41AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 17:49:42 +0100 Kory Maincent wrote:
>
> > > I think I should only drop patch 11 and 12 from this series which add
> > > something new while the rest is reshuffle or fix code.
>
> > I mentioned 13 & 14 because I suspected we may need to wait for
> > the maintainers of regulator, and merge 13 in some special way.
> > Looks like Mark merged 13 already, so 🤷️
Yes, Mark is really responsive!
Tomorrow I will send a new version without the regulator patch and the PSE
device index support.
> Well, you were saying that the subdevice structure didn't make sense and
> you wanted to see it dropped for now so given that it's -rc6 and it's
> unlikely that'll get fixed for this release it made sense to just apply
> the regulator bit for now and get myself off these huge threads.
>
> There's no direct dependency here so it should be fine to merge the
> networking stuff separately if that does get sorted out.
Thanks Mark for taking the patch!
About the following two patches do you prefer to let them in the future budget
evaluation strategy support net series or should I send them directly in
regulator tree?
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250103-feature_poe_port_prio-v4-17-dc91a3c0c187@bootlin.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250103-feature_poe_port_prio-v4-18-dc91a3c0c187@bootlin.com/
If I send them in regulator tree do you think it would be doable to have them
accepted before the merge window. I will resend them with the fixes asked by
Krzysztof (convert miniwatt to milliwatt).
Regards,
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists