[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250110163225.43fe8043@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 16:32:25 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Lei Wei <quic_leiwei@...cinc.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, quic_kkumarcs@...cinc.com,
quic_suruchia@...cinc.com, quic_pavir@...cinc.com,
quic_linchen@...cinc.com, quic_luoj@...cinc.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org,
vsmuthu@....qualcomm.com, john@...ozen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/5] net: pcs: qcom-ipq9574: Add PCS
instantiation and phylink operations
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 10:52:52 +0000 Simon Horman wrote:
> I don't think there is a need to update the code just to make Smatch happy.
> Only if there is a real problem. Which, with the discussion at the link
> above in mind, does not seem to be the case here.
Maybe be good to add a one line comment in the code to make it clear
this is intentional. Chances are we'll get a semi-automated "fixes"
for this before long.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists