netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] net: stmmac: Switch to zero-copy in non-XDP RX path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e9cacef2-1049-4296-92f4-85041f4b6eaf@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 17:48:22 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc: Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@...ux.dev>, Furong Xu <0x1207@...il.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, xfr@...look.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/3] net: stmmac: Switch to zero-copy in
 non-XDP RX path

> 1. It's author's responsibility to read netdev CI output on Patchwork,
>    reviewers shouldn't copy its logs.

I somewhat disagree with that. We want the author to of already run
all the static analysers before they post code. We don't want the
mailing list abused as a CI system.

So rather than pointing out a specific problem, it can be better to
say that static analysers XZY is not happy with this patch, please run
it and fix the issues it reports.

	Andrew