[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c5c4271-14d5-476d-a237-214558289c67@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 13:49:50 -0600
From: Ninad Palsule <ninad@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: minyard@....org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, ratbert@...aday-tech.com,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
joel@....id.au, andrew@...econstruct.com.au,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, eajames@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] bindings: ipmi: Add binding for IPMB device intf
Hi Rob,
On 1/10/25 10:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 10:36:30AM -0600, Ninad Palsule wrote:
>> Add device tree binding document for the IPMB device interface.
>> This device is already in use in both driver and .dts files.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ninad Palsule <ninad@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/ipmi/ipmb-dev.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/ipmb-dev.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/ipmb-dev.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/ipmb-dev.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..a8f46f1b883e
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ipmi/ipmb-dev.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/ipmi/ipmb-dev.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: IPMB Device
>> +
>> +description: IPMB Device interface to receive request and send response
> IPMB is not defined anywhere.
>
> Which side of the interface does this apply to? How do I know if I have
> an ipmb-dev?
>
> This document needs to stand on its own. Bindings exist in a standalone
> tree without kernel drivers or docs.
Thanks for the review. I improved the documentation. Please check.
Regards,
Ninad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists