netdev - [PATCH net-next 02/10] bnxt_en Refactor completion ring allocation logic for P5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250113063927.4017173-3-michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2025 22:39:19 -0800
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
	pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com,
	andrew.gospodarek@...adcom.com,
	somnath.kotur@...adcom.com,
	Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 02/10] bnxt_en Refactor completion ring allocation logic for P5_PLUS chips

Add a new bnxt_hwrm_cp_ring_alloc_p5() function to handle allocating
one completion ring on P5_PLUS chips.  This simplifies the existing code
and will be useful later in the series.

Reviewed-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 44 +++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
index 8527788bed91..d364a707664b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -7172,6 +7172,25 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_rx_agg_ring_alloc(struct bnxt *bp,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int bnxt_hwrm_cp_ring_alloc_p5(struct bnxt *bp,
+				      struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr)
+{
+	struct bnxt_napi *bnapi = cpr->bnapi;
+	u32 type = HWRM_RING_ALLOC_CMPL;
+	struct bnxt_ring_struct *ring;
+	u32 map_idx = bnapi->index;
+	int rc;
+
+	ring = &cpr->cp_ring_struct;
+	ring->handle = BNXT_SET_NQ_HDL(cpr);
+	rc = hwrm_ring_alloc_send_msg(bp, ring, type, map_idx);
+	if (rc)
+		return rc;
+	bnxt_set_db(bp, &cpr->cp_db, type, map_idx, ring->fw_ring_id);
+	bnxt_db_cq(bp, &cpr->cp_db, cpr->cp_raw_cons);
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int bnxt_hwrm_ring_alloc(struct bnxt *bp)
 {
 	bool agg_rings = !!(bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_AGG_RINGS);
@@ -7215,19 +7234,9 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_ring_alloc(struct bnxt *bp)
 		u32 map_idx;
 
 		if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5_PLUS) {
-			struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr2 = txr->tx_cpr;
-			struct bnxt_napi *bnapi = txr->bnapi;
-			u32 type2 = HWRM_RING_ALLOC_CMPL;
-
-			ring = &cpr2->cp_ring_struct;
-			ring->handle = BNXT_SET_NQ_HDL(cpr2);
-			map_idx = bnapi->index;
-			rc = hwrm_ring_alloc_send_msg(bp, ring, type2, map_idx);
+			rc = bnxt_hwrm_cp_ring_alloc_p5(bp, txr->tx_cpr);
 			if (rc)
 				goto err_out;
-			bnxt_set_db(bp, &cpr2->cp_db, type2, map_idx,
-				    ring->fw_ring_id);
-			bnxt_db_cq(bp, &cpr2->cp_db, cpr2->cp_raw_cons);
 		}
 		ring = &txr->tx_ring_struct;
 		map_idx = i;
@@ -7247,20 +7256,9 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_ring_alloc(struct bnxt *bp)
 		if (!agg_rings)
 			bnxt_db_write(bp, &rxr->rx_db, rxr->rx_prod);
 		if (bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_CHIP_P5_PLUS) {
-			struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr2 = rxr->rx_cpr;
-			struct bnxt_napi *bnapi = rxr->bnapi;
-			u32 type2 = HWRM_RING_ALLOC_CMPL;
-			struct bnxt_ring_struct *ring;
-			u32 map_idx = bnapi->index;
-
-			ring = &cpr2->cp_ring_struct;
-			ring->handle = BNXT_SET_NQ_HDL(cpr2);
-			rc = hwrm_ring_alloc_send_msg(bp, ring, type2, map_idx);
+			rc = bnxt_hwrm_cp_ring_alloc_p5(bp, rxr->rx_cpr);
 			if (rc)
 				goto err_out;
-			bnxt_set_db(bp, &cpr2->cp_db, type2, map_idx,
-				    ring->fw_ring_id);
-			bnxt_db_cq(bp, &cpr2->cp_db, cpr2->cp_raw_cons);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.30.1