[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z4Y_F_OeqBnizGss@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:10:23 +0530
From: Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@...ux.ibm.com>
To: "Song, Yoong Siang" <yoong.siang.song@...el.com>
Cc: "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
"daniel@...earbox.net" <daniel@...earbox.net>,
"Fijalkowski, Maciej" <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
"sdf@...ichev.me" <sdf@...ichev.me>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "ast@...nel.org" <ast@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Fix mismatch in if_xdp.h between tools and kernel UAPI
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 01:05:06AM +0000, Song, Yoong Siang wrote:
> On Monday, January 13, 2025 5:59 PM, Vishal Chourasia <vishalc@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> >Hello all,
> >
> >While building libbpf, I encountered the following warning:
> >
> >Warning: Kernel ABI header at 'tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h' differs from
> >latest version at 'include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h'
> >
> >A brief diff shows discrepancies in the doc comments regarding `union
> >xsk_tx_metadata` vs. `struct xsk_tx_metadata` references. Below is the
> >relevant snippet:
> >$ diff tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> >120c120
> >< * field of union xsk_tx_metadata.
> >---
> >> * field of struct xsk_tx_metadata.
> >125c125
> >< * are communicated via csum_start and csum_offset fields of union
> >---
> >> * are communicated via csum_start and csum_offset fields of struct
> >
> >This patch aligns the documentation in
> >`tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h` with the kernel UAPI header in
> >`include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h` to remove the mismatch and associated
> >warning.
> >
> >Please consider applying this fix. Let me know if there are any
> >questions or if additional changes are needed.
> >
> >vishal.c
>
> Hi Vishal. C,
>
> Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The changes look good to me.
> Could you please confirm if you will be submitting this patch formally,
> or do you need assistance to submit it?
>
> Thanks & Regards,
> Siang
Hi Siang,
I need assistance as I am not well-versed in the code or the structures
involved here. I was unsure about the appropriate commit message,
so I submitted it as an RFC patch.
vishal.c
>
> >
> >diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> >index 2f082b01ff228..42ec5ddaab8dc 100644
> >--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> >+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/if_xdp.h
> >@@ -117,12 +117,12 @@ struct xdp_options {
> > ((1ULL << XSK_UNALIGNED_BUF_OFFSET_SHIFT) - 1)
> >
> > /* Request transmit timestamp. Upon completion, put it into tx_timestamp
> >- * field of union xsk_tx_metadata.
> >+ * field of struct xsk_tx_metadata.
> > */
> > #define XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_TIMESTAMP (1 << 0)
> >
> > /* Request transmit checksum offload. Checksum start position and offset
> >- * are communicated via csum_start and csum_offset fields of union
> >+ * are communicated via csum_start and csum_offset fields of struct
> > * xsk_tx_metadata.
> > */
> > #define XDP_TXMD_FLAGS_CHECKSUM (1 << 1)
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists