[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d9fc5212-9710-449e-90b9-a195305d990f@molgen.mpg.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 03:21:59 +0100
From: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@...gen.mpg.de>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Joey Lu <a0987203069@...il.com>, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com, richardcochran@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ychuang3@...oton.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org, alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joabreu@...opsys.com, schung@...oton.com,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, yclu4@...oton.com,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v7 3/3] net: stmmac: dwmac-nuvoton: Add dwmac
glue for Nuvoton MA35 family
Dear Andrew,
Thank you for your quick reply.
Am 14.01.25 um 21:16 schrieb Andrew Lunn:
>>> +#define NVT_MISCR_RMII BIT(0)
>>> +
>>> +/* 2000ps is mapped to 0x0 ~ 0xF */
>>
>> Excuse my ignorance: What is ps?
>
> picoseconds. An RGMII link needs a 2ns delay between the clock line
> and the data lines. Some MACs allow you to tune the delay they can
> insert, in this case in steps of 2ns / 16.
Thank you for the clarification. Maybe it’s my English, but I didn’t
deduce this from how the comment is worded. I do not have a better idea
either.
>>> +#define NVT_PATH_DELAY_DEC 134
>>> +#define NVT_TX_DELAY_MASK GENMASK(19, 16)
>>> +#define NVT_RX_DELAY_MASK GENMASK(23, 20)
>>> +
>>> +struct nvt_priv_data {
>>> + struct platform_device *pdev;
>>> + struct regmap *regmap;
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static struct nvt_priv_data *
>>> +nvt_gmac_setup(struct platform_device *pdev, struct plat_stmmacenet_data *plat)
>>> +{
>>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> + struct nvt_priv_data *bsp_priv;
>>> + phy_interface_t phy_mode;
>>> + u32 tx_delay, rx_delay;
>>
>> Please append the unit to the variable name.
>
> Which is trick, because they are in units of 2000/16 of a picosecond.
Understood. Maybe a comment could be added?
Kind regards,
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists