lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250114140813.5a7d527f@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 14:08:13 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ahmed Zaki <ahmed.zaki@...el.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
 andrew+netdev@...n.ch, edumazet@...gle.com, horms@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, michael.chan@...adcom.com,
 tariqt@...dia.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
 przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, jdamato@...tly.com, shayd@...dia.com,
 akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shayagr@...zon.com,
 kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com, pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com,
 yury.norov@...il.com, darinzon@...zon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 1/6] net: move ARFS rmap management to core

On Mon, 13 Jan 2025 10:10:37 -0700 Ahmed Zaki wrote:
> -#endif /* CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL */
> +	return netif_enable_cpu_rmap(adapter->netdev, adapter->num_io_queues);
> +#else
>  	return 0;
> +#endif /* CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL */

Let's try to eliminate some of the ifdef-ery on the driver side.
netif_enable_cpu_rmap() should simply do nothing if !CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL

> @@ -2398,6 +2401,9 @@ struct net_device {
> 	struct lock_class_key	*qdisc_tx_busylock;
> 	bool			proto_down;
> 	bool			threaded;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
> +	bool			rx_cpu_rmap_auto;
> +#endif

similar point, don't hide it, it's just one byte and we can just leave
it as false if !CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL. It can save us a bunch of other ifdefs

> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
> +static void netif_disable_cpu_rmap(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +	free_irq_cpu_rmap(dev->rx_cpu_rmap);
> +	dev->rx_cpu_rmap = NULL;
> +	dev->rx_cpu_rmap_auto = false;
> +}

Better do do:

static void netif_disable_cpu_rmap(struct net_device *dev)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
	free_irq_cpu_rmap(dev->rx_cpu_rmap);
	dev->rx_cpu_rmap = NULL;
	dev->rx_cpu_rmap_auto = false;
#endif
}

IOW if not relevant the function should do nothing

> +int netif_enable_cpu_rmap(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int num_irqs)
> +{
> +	dev->rx_cpu_rmap = alloc_irq_cpu_rmap(num_irqs);
> +	if (!dev->rx_cpu_rmap)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	dev->rx_cpu_rmap_auto = true;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_enable_cpu_rmap);

here you can depend on dead code elimination:

int netif_enable_cpu_rmap(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int num_irqs)
{
	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL))
		return 0;

	...
}

> +#endif
> +
> +void netif_napi_set_irq(struct napi_struct *napi, int irq)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
> +	int rc;
> +#endif
> +	napi->irq = irq;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
> +	if (napi->dev->rx_cpu_rmap && napi->dev->rx_cpu_rmap_auto) {
> +		rc = irq_cpu_rmap_add(napi->dev->rx_cpu_rmap, irq);
> +		if (rc) {
> +			netdev_warn(napi->dev, "Unable to update ARFS map (%d)\n",
> +				    rc);
> +			netif_disable_cpu_rmap(napi->dev);
> +		}
> +	}
> +#endif

Declare rc inside the if to avoid the extra ifdef on variable decl

> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(netif_napi_set_irq);
> +
>  static void napi_restore_config(struct napi_struct *n)
>  {
>  	n->defer_hard_irqs = n->config->defer_hard_irqs;
> @@ -11421,6 +11461,10 @@ void free_netdev(struct net_device *dev)
>  	/* Flush device addresses */
>  	dev_addr_flush(dev);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RFS_ACCEL
> +	if (dev->rx_cpu_rmap && dev->rx_cpu_rmap_auto)

don't check dev->rx_cpu_rmap, dev->rx_cpu_rmap_auto is enough

> +		netif_disable_cpu_rmap(dev);
> +#endif
>  	list_for_each_entry_safe(p, n, &dev->napi_list, dev_list)
>  		netif_napi_del(p);
>  

IRQs are often allocated in ndo_open and freed in ndo_stop, so
you need to catch netif_napi_del or napi_disable and remove
the IRQ from the map.

Similarly netif_napi_set_irq() may get called with -1 to clear
the IRQ number, which you currently treat at a real IRQ id, AFAICT.
-- 
pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ