[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250114035118.110297-4-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2025 19:51:09 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
horms@...nel.org,
jdamato@...tly.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 03/11] net: make netdev_lock() protect netdev->reg_state
Protect writes to netdev->reg_state with netdev_lock().
>From now on holding netdev_lock() is sufficient to prevent
the net_device from getting unregistered, so code which
wants to hold just a single netdev around no longer needs
to hold rtnl_lock.
We do not protect the NETREG_UNREGISTERED -> NETREG_RELEASED
transition. We'd need to move mutex_destroy(netdev->lock)
to .release, but the real reason is that trying to stop
the unregistration process mid-way would be unsafe / crazy.
Taking references on such devices is not safe, either.
So the intended semantics are to lock REGISTERED devices.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/netdevice.h | 2 +-
net/core/dev.c | 6 ++++++
2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 0e008ce9d5ee..bdbc5849469c 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -2448,7 +2448,7 @@ struct net_device {
* Should always be taken using netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers.
* Drivers are free to use it for other protection.
*
- * Protects: @net_shaper_hierarchy.
+ * Protects: @reg_state, @net_shaper_hierarchy.
* Ordering: take after rtnl_lock.
*/
struct mutex lock;
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 5c1e71afbe1c..2ded6eedb4cc 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -10778,7 +10778,9 @@ int register_netdevice(struct net_device *dev)
ret = netdev_register_kobject(dev);
+ netdev_lock(dev);
WRITE_ONCE(dev->reg_state, ret ? NETREG_UNREGISTERED : NETREG_REGISTERED);
+ netdev_unlock(dev);
if (ret)
goto err_uninit_notify;
@@ -11052,7 +11054,9 @@ void netdev_run_todo(void)
continue;
}
+ netdev_lock(dev);
WRITE_ONCE(dev->reg_state, NETREG_UNREGISTERED);
+ netdev_unlock(dev);
linkwatch_sync_dev(dev);
}
@@ -11658,7 +11662,9 @@ void unregister_netdevice_many_notify(struct list_head *head,
list_for_each_entry(dev, head, unreg_list) {
/* And unlink it from device chain. */
unlist_netdevice(dev);
+ netdev_lock(dev);
WRITE_ONCE(dev->reg_state, NETREG_UNREGISTERING);
+ netdev_unlock(dev);
}
flush_all_backlogs();
--
2.47.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists