[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250115080608.28127-11-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:06:07 +0900
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
CC: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuni1840@...il.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 10/11] ipv6: Convert inet6_rtm_newaddr() to per-netns RTNL.
Let's register inet6_rtm_newaddr() with RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_PERNET
and hold rtnl_net_lock() before __dev_get_by_index().
Now that inet6_addr_add() and inet6_addr_modify() are always
called under per-netns RTNL.
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
---
net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 9ae25a8d1632..b848e4038d2e 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -3014,7 +3014,7 @@ static int inet6_addr_add(struct net *net, struct net_device *dev,
struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp;
struct inet6_dev *idev;
- ASSERT_RTNL();
+ ASSERT_RTNL_NET(net);
if (cfg->plen > 128) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Invalid prefix length");
@@ -4849,7 +4849,7 @@ static int inet6_addr_modify(struct net *net, struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp,
bool new_peer = false;
bool had_prefixroute;
- ASSERT_RTNL();
+ ASSERT_RTNL_NET(net);
if (cfg->ifa_flags & IFA_F_MANAGETEMPADDR &&
(ifp->flags & IFA_F_TEMPORARY || ifp->prefix_len != 64))
@@ -5016,15 +5016,20 @@ inet6_rtm_newaddr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
}
}
+ rtnl_net_lock(net);
+
dev = __dev_get_by_index(net, ifm->ifa_index);
if (!dev) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Unable to find the interface");
- return -ENODEV;
+ err = -ENODEV;
+ goto unlock;
}
idev = ipv6_find_idev(dev);
- if (IS_ERR(idev))
- return PTR_ERR(idev);
+ if (IS_ERR(idev)) {
+ err = PTR_ERR(idev);
+ goto unlock;
+ }
if (!ipv6_allow_optimistic_dad(net, idev))
cfg.ifa_flags &= ~IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC;
@@ -5032,7 +5037,8 @@ inet6_rtm_newaddr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
if (cfg.ifa_flags & IFA_F_NODAD &&
cfg.ifa_flags & IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC) {
NL_SET_ERR_MSG(extack, "IFA_F_NODAD and IFA_F_OPTIMISTIC are mutually exclusive");
- return -EINVAL;
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto unlock;
}
ifa = ipv6_get_ifaddr(net, cfg.pfx, dev, 1);
@@ -5041,7 +5047,8 @@ inet6_rtm_newaddr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
* It would be best to check for !NLM_F_CREATE here but
* userspace already relies on not having to provide this.
*/
- return inet6_addr_add(net, dev, &cfg, expires, flags, extack);
+ err = inet6_addr_add(net, dev, &cfg, expires, flags, extack);
+ goto unlock;
}
if (nlh->nlmsg_flags & NLM_F_EXCL ||
@@ -5053,6 +5060,8 @@ inet6_rtm_newaddr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh,
}
in6_ifa_put(ifa);
+unlock:
+ rtnl_net_unlock(net);
return err;
}
@@ -7393,7 +7402,7 @@ static const struct rtnl_msg_handler addrconf_rtnl_msg_handlers[] __initconst_or
{.owner = THIS_MODULE, .protocol = PF_INET6, .msgtype = RTM_GETLINK,
.dumpit = inet6_dump_ifinfo, .flags = RTNL_FLAG_DUMP_UNLOCKED},
{.owner = THIS_MODULE, .protocol = PF_INET6, .msgtype = RTM_NEWADDR,
- .doit = inet6_rtm_newaddr},
+ .doit = inet6_rtm_newaddr, .flags = RTNL_FLAG_DOIT_PERNET},
{.owner = THIS_MODULE, .protocol = PF_INET6, .msgtype = RTM_DELADDR,
.doit = inet6_rtm_deladdr},
{.owner = THIS_MODULE, .protocol = PF_INET6, .msgtype = RTM_GETADDR,
--
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists