[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e7479c79-525d-4796-b9ed-7ae2ddb5435b@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 09:36:11 +0100
From: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <jiri@...nulli.us>,
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <pabeni@...hat.com>,
<andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <horms@...nel.org>, <jdamato@...tly.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 01/11] net: add netdev_lock() /
netdev_unlock() helpers
On 1/15/25 04:53, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> Add helpers for locking the netdev instance, use it in drivers
> and the shaper code. This will make grepping for the lock usage
> much easier, as we extend the lock to cover more fields.
>
> Reviewed-by: Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> ---
> CC: anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com
> CC: przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com
> CC: jiri@...nulli.us
> ---
> include/linux/netdevice.h | 23 ++++++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/iavf/iavf_main.c | 74 ++++++++++-----------
> drivers/net/netdevsim/ethtool.c | 4 +-
> net/shaper/shaper.c | 6 +-
> 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
Thank you,
Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
and Ack for iavf too
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> index bced03fb349e..891c5bdb894c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
> +++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
> @@ -2444,8 +2444,12 @@ struct net_device {
> u32 napi_defer_hard_irqs;
>
> /**
> - * @lock: protects @net_shaper_hierarchy, feel free to use for other
> - * netdev-scope protection. Ordering: take after rtnl_lock.
> + * @lock: netdev-scope lock, protects a small selection of fields.
> + * Should always be taken using netdev_lock() / netdev_unlock() helpers.
> + * Drivers are free to use it for other protection.
As with devl_lock(), would be good to specify the ordering for those who
happen to take both. My guess is that devl_lock() is after netdev_lock()
> + *
> + * Protects: @net_shaper_hierarchy.
> + * Ordering: take after rtnl_lock.
> */
> struct mutex lock;
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists