[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z4jyCZQOy8JMVu3Q@tuxmaker.boeblingen.de.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:48:25 +0100
From: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Michael Kelley <mhklinux@...look.com>, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
"saeedm@...dia.com" <saeedm@...dia.com>,
"tariqt@...dia.com" <tariqt@...dia.com>,
"linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Josh Don <joshdon@...gle.com>, Barret Rhoden <brho@...gle.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
Zaslonko Mikhail <zaslonko@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [v3 PATCH] rhashtable: Fix rhashtable_try_insert test
On Tue, Jan 14, 2025 at 11:15:19AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
Hi Herbert,
> Thanks for testing! The patch needs one more change though as
> moving the atomic_inc outside of the lock was a bad idea on my
> part. This could cause atomic_inc/atomic_dec to be reordered
> thus resulting in an underflow.
I want to confirm that this patch fixes massive strangenesses and
few crashes observed on s390 systems, in addition to OOMs reported
by Mikhail Zaslonko earlier.
> Thanks,
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists