[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a9724b0-440f-4647-9505-058717f7ee07@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 09:10:10 -0600
From: Ninad Palsule <ninad@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: minyard@....org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
andrew+netdev@...n.ch, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
joel@....id.au, andrew@...econstruct.com.au,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, eajames@...ux.ibm.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 03/10] dt-bindings: gpio: ast2400-gpio: Add hogs
parsing
Hi Rob,
On 1/15/25 08:24, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> I was about to say that, but this matches what gpio-hog.yaml defines.
> Why we did both, I don't remember. We could probably eliminate
> 'hog-[0-9]+' as that doesn't appear to be used much.
>
> Long term, I want to make all gpio controllers reference a gpio
> controller schema and put the hog stuff there. Then we have the node
> names defined in 1 place.
Ok, choosing suffix.
Thanks for the review.
Regards,
Ninad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists