[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<173699824504.995574.8048482828230619557.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 03:30:45 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, horms@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 0/5] net: reduce RTNL pressure in
unregister_netdevice()
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Tue, 14 Jan 2025 20:55:26 +0000 you wrote:
> One major source of RTNL contention resides in unregister_netdevice()
>
> Due to RCU protection of various network structures, and
> unregister_netdevice() being a synchronous function,
> it is calling potentially slow functions while holding RTNL.
>
> I think we can release RTNL in two points, so that three
> slow functions are called while RTNL can be used
> by other threads.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v3,net-next,1/5] net: expedite synchronize_net() for cleanup_net()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/0734d7c3d93c
- [v3,net-next,2/5] net: no longer assume RTNL is held in flush_all_backlogs()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/8a2b61e9e879
- [v3,net-next,3/5] net: no longer hold RTNL while calling flush_all_backlogs()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/cfa579f66656
- [v3,net-next,4/5] net: reduce RTNL hold duration in unregister_netdevice_many_notify() (part 1)
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/ae646f1a0bb9
- [v3,net-next,5/5] net: reduce RTNL hold duration in unregister_netdevice_many_notify() (part 2)
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/83419b61d187
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists