netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: give up on the cmsg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250117065323.42daa2f9@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 06:53:23 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
Cc: <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, <horms@...nel.org>,
 <shuah@...nel.org>, <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
 <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] selftests: net: give up on the cmsg_time
 accuracy on slow machines

On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:49:23 +0100 Petr Machata wrote:
> This logging and xfail handling duplicates lib.sh. Would a patch like
> below be OK with you? The gist of it is to just use check_err, log_test
> and xfail_on_slow from lib.sh to achieve what the test open-codes.

Hm, maybe? I'm not going to say no if you send a patch, but IMHO
if we were to change the output I think we should make it ktap.