[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <173713891639.5144.4856802697008623996@kwain>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 19:35:16 +0100
From: Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net-sysfs: remove rtnl_trylock from device attributes
Quoting Stephen Hemminger (2025-01-17 18:03:11)
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 11:26:08 +0100
> Antoine Tenart <atenart@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/net/core/rtnetlink.c b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> > index 1f4d4b5570ab..7c3a0f79a669 100644
> > --- a/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> > +++ b/net/core/rtnetlink.c
> > @@ -80,6 +80,12 @@ void rtnl_lock(void)
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtnl_lock);
> >
> > +int rtnl_lock_interruptible(void)
> > +{
> > + return mutex_lock_interruptible(&rtnl_mutex);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtnl_lock_interruptible);
>
> Is export symbol needed at all? The sysfs stuff isn't in a module.
You're right, this could be removed and only added if/when there is a
use case. The only reason would be for consistence with other similar
helpers but some are not exported already so I guess that's OK.
Thanks,
Antoine
Powered by blists - more mailing lists