netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v11 04/21] net: page_pool: create hooks for custom memory providers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4f8dc7b1-0213-46a1-85f5-2d77e7b98067@davidwei.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2025 18:15:57 -0800
From: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
 <hawk@...nel.org>, David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>,
 Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
 Stanislav Fomichev <stfomichev@...il.com>, Joe Damato <jdamato@...tly.com>,
 Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v11 04/21] net: page_pool: create hooks for
 custom memory providers

On 2025-01-16 17:48, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 17:46:34 -0800 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 15:16:46 -0800 David Wei wrote:
>>> From: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
>>>
>>> A spin off from the original page pool memory providers patch by Jakub,
>>> which allows extending page pools with custom allocators. One of such
>>> providers is devmem TCP, and the other is io_uring zerocopy added in
>>> following patches.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> # initial mp proposal
>>> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230707183935.997267-7-kuba@kernel.org/
>>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Wei <dw@...idwei.uk>  
>>
>> FWIW you still need to add my SoB for Co-developed-by.
>> Doesn't checkpatch complain?
>> I guess not a deal breaker here if I'm the one applying it...
> 
> Ah, and in case I am not..
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>

I'm sorry... Checkpatch does complain but I missed it in the sea of
warnings of 'prefer unsigned int to bare unsigned'.