[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250117132208.1f87a2dc@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:22:08 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, xudu@...hat.com, mschmidt@...hat.com,
jmaxwell@...hat.com, poros@...hat.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 intel-net 0/3] ice: fix Rx data path for heavy 9k MTU
traffic
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 16:18:57 +0100 Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH v2 intel-net 0/3] ice: fix Rx data path for heavy 9k MTU traffic
nit: could you use iwl-net and iwl-next as the tree names?
That's what we match on in NIPA to categorize Intel patches.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists