[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1201143.1737383111@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:25:11 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/24] crypto: Add 'krb5enc' hash and cipher AEAD algorithm
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> wrote:
> > +static void krb5enc_decrypt_hash_done(void *data, int err)
> > +{
> > + struct aead_request *req = data;
> > +
> > + if (err)
> > + return krb5enc_request_complete(req, err);
> > +
> > + err = krb5enc_verify_hash(req, 0);
>
> Hi David,
>
> Sparse complains that the second argument to krb5enc_verify_hash should be
> a pointer rather than an integer. So perhaps this would be slightly better
> expressed as (completely untested!):
>
> err = krb5enc_verify_hash(req, NULL);
Actually, no. It should be "ahreq->result + authsize" and
krb5enc_verify_hash() shouldn't calculate ihash, but use its hash parameter.
I wonder if the testmgr driver tests running the algorithms asynchronously...
Thanks,
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists