netdev - Re: [PATCH v9 02/27] sfc: add cxl support using new CXL API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7e395c6c-6922-53ab-b4d1-7453cfd9a86c@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 14:35:40 +0000
From: Alejandro Lucero Palau <alucerop@....com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, alejandro.lucero-palau@....com,
 linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edward.cree@....com,
 davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 edumazet@...gle.com, dave.jiang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 02/27] sfc: add cxl support using new CXL API


On 1/18/25 01:30, Dan Williams wrote:
> alejandro.lucero-palau@ wrote:
>> From: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>>
>> Add CXL initialization based on new CXL API for accel drivers and make
>> it dependent on kernel CXL configuration.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <alucerop@....com>
>> Reviewed-by: Martin Habets <habetsm.xilinx@...il.com>
>> Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/Kconfig      |  7 +++
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/Makefile     |  1 +
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx.c        | 23 ++++++-
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c    | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.h    | 34 +++++++++++
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/net_driver.h | 10 ++++
>>   6 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.c
>>   create mode 100644 drivers/net/ethernet/sfc/efx_cxl.h
> v9 did not pick up the comments I left on v8 of this patch:


That is because v9 was out before you commented in v8.

Those patches did not change from v8 to v9, so your comments are still 
valid.

I did apply the changes and they will be in v10.



> http://lore.kernel.org/677ddb432dafe_2aff429488@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch