netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 09/11] ipv6: Move lifetime validation to inet6_rtm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250120211348.88128-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 13:13:48 -0800
From: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@...zon.com>
To: <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <davem@...emloft.net>, <dsahern@...nel.org>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	<horms@...nel.org>, <kuni1840@...il.com>, <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 09/11] ipv6: Move lifetime validation to inet6_rtm_newaddr().

From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 12:29:45 -0800
> On Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:06:06 +0900 Kuniyuki Iwashima wrote:
> > +	expires = 0;
> > +	flags = 0;
> 
> Any reason not to add these to the cfg struct?
> Because these are not strictly attributes for the address?

Yes, I thought it's for fib6_config, but I have no strong
preference.  I can post a follow-up or v3.