netdev - [PATCH net v2 5/6] vsock/test: Add test for UAF due to socket unbinding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250121-vsock-transport-vs-autobind-v2-5-aad6069a4e8c@rbox.co>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 15:44:06 +0100
From: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>, 
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
 Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, George Zhang <georgezhang@...are.com>, 
 Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>, Andy King <acking@...are.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Subject: [PATCH net v2 5/6] vsock/test: Add test for UAF due to socket
 unbinding

Fail the autobind, then trigger a transport reassign. Socket might get
unbound from unbound_sockets, which then leads to a reference count
underflow.

Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
---
 tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
index 28a5083bbfd600cf84a1a85cec2f272ce6912dd3..572e0fd3e5a841f846fb304a24192f63d57ec052 100644
--- a/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c
@@ -1458,6 +1458,59 @@ static void test_stream_cred_upd_on_set_rcvlowat(const struct test_opts *opts)
 	test_stream_credit_update_test(opts, false);
 }
 
+#define MAX_PORT_RETRIES	24	/* net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c */
+
+/* Test attempts to trigger a transport release for an unbound socket. This can
+ * lead to a reference count mishandling.
+ */
+static void test_stream_transport_uaf_client(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+	int sockets[MAX_PORT_RETRIES];
+	struct sockaddr_vm addr;
+	int fd, i, alen;
+
+	fd = vsock_bind(VMADDR_CID_ANY, VMADDR_PORT_ANY, SOCK_STREAM);
+
+	alen = sizeof(addr);
+	if (getsockname(fd, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, &alen)) {
+		perror("getsockname");
+		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < MAX_PORT_RETRIES; ++i)
+		sockets[i] = vsock_bind(VMADDR_CID_ANY, ++addr.svm_port,
+					SOCK_STREAM);
+
+	close(fd);
+	fd = socket(AF_VSOCK, SOCK_STREAM, 0);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		perror("socket");
+		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	}
+
+	if (!vsock_connect_fd(fd, addr.svm_cid, addr.svm_port)) {
+		perror("Unexpected connect() #1 success");
+		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	}
+
+	/* Vulnerable system may crash now. */
+	if (!vsock_connect_fd(fd, VMADDR_CID_HOST, VMADDR_PORT_ANY)) {
+		perror("Unexpected connect() #2 success");
+		exit(EXIT_FAILURE);
+	}
+
+	close(fd);
+	while (i--)
+		close(sockets[i]);
+
+	control_writeln("DONE");
+}
+
+static void test_stream_transport_uaf_server(const struct test_opts *opts)
+{
+	control_expectln("DONE");
+}
+
 static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
 	{
 		.name = "SOCK_STREAM connection reset",
@@ -1588,6 +1641,11 @@ static struct test_case test_cases[] = {
 		.run_client = test_seqpacket_unsent_bytes_client,
 		.run_server = test_seqpacket_unsent_bytes_server,
 	},
+	{
+		.name = "SOCK_STREAM transport release use-after-free",
+		.run_client = test_stream_transport_uaf_client,
+		.run_server = test_stream_transport_uaf_server,
+	},
 	{},
 };
 

-- 
2.48.1