netdev - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/5] bpf/selftests: add selftest for bpf_smc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250122024651.GB81479@j66a10360.sqa.eu95>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 10:46:51 +0800
From: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com    >
To: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>, kgraul@...ux.ibm.com,
	wenjia@...ux.ibm.com, jaka@...ux.ibm.com, ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org, martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	pabeni@...hat.com, song@...nel.org, sdf@...gle.com,
	haoluo@...gle.com, yhs@...com, edumazet@...gle.com,
	john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, jolsa@...nel.org,
	guwen@...ux.alibaba.com, kuba@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 5/5] bpf/selftests: add selftest for
 bpf_smc_ops

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 12:12:07PM +0530, Saket Kumar Bhaskar wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 03:44:42PM +0800, D. Wythe wrote:
> > This tests introduces a tiny smc_ops for filtering SMC connections based on
> > IP pairs, and also adds a realistic topology model to verify this ops.
> > 
> > Also, we can only use SMC loopback under CI test, so an
> > additional configuration needs to be enabled.
> > 
> > Follow the steps below to run this test.
> > 
> > make -C tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> > cd tools/testing/selftests/bpf
> > sudo ./test_progs -t smc
> > 
> > Results shows:
> > Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: D. Wythe <alibuda@...ux.alibaba.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config            |   4 +
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c   | 397 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c   | 117 ++++++
> >  3 files changed, 518 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_bpf_smc.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/bpf_smc.c
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> > index c378d5d07e02..fac2f2a9d02f 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
> > @@ -113,3 +113,7 @@ CONFIG_XDP_SOCKETS=y
> > +};
> Tested this selftest with patches applied on powerpc.
> 
> #./test_progs -t bpf_smc
> 
> net.smc.ops = linkcheck
> #27/1    bpf_smc/topo:OK
> #27      bpf_smc:OK
> Summary: 1/1 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED
> 
> Tested-by: Saket Kumar Bhaskar <skb99@...ux.ibm.com>
> 
> Thanks,
> Saket

Hi Saket,

Thanks for your testing. I hope you don't mind if I add your test-by in
the next version.

Best wishes,
D. Wythe

> > -- 
> > 2.45.0
> >