[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACKFLim4WrqAPY-WB2C8Q8n49nFavi9xtWV1Xu3d5=vX91fsSw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2025 23:41:53 -0800
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, horms@...nel.org,
dan.carpenter@...aro.org, pavan.chebbi@...adcom.com, mchan@...adcom.com,
kuniyu@...zon.com, romieu@...zoreil.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/7] eth: tg3: fix calling napi_enable() in
atomic context
On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 2:15 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> tg3 has a spin lock protecting most of the config,
> switch to taking netdev_lock() explicitly on enable/start
> paths. Disable/stop paths seem to not be under the spin
> lock (since napi_disable() already couldn't sleep),
> so leave that side as is.
>
> tg3_restart_hw() releases and re-takes the spin lock,
> we need to do the same because dev_close() needs to
> take netdev_lock().
The patch looks good to me. One minor suggestion is to add the Sparse macros:
__releases(tp->dev->lock)
__acquires(tp->dev->lock)
to tg3_restart_hw() since we already do the same thing there for tp->lock.
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4209 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists