[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250123104536.GL395043@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 10:45:36 +0000
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com, xudu@...hat.com, mschmidt@...hat.com,
jmaxwell@...hat.com, poros@...hat.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 iwl-net 3/3] ice: stop storing XDP verdict within
ice_rx_buf
On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 04:10:46PM +0100, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
> Idea behind having ice_rx_buf::act was to simplify and speed up the Rx
> data path by walking through buffers that were representing cleaned HW
> Rx descriptors. Since it caused us a major headache recently and we
> rolled back to old approach that 'puts' Rx buffers right after running
> XDP prog/creating skb, this is useless now and should be removed.
>
> Get rid of ice_rx_buf::act and related logic. We still need to take care
> of a corner case where XDP program releases a particular fragment.
>
> Make ice_run_xdp() to return its result and use it within
> ice_put_rx_mbuf().
>
> Fixes: 2fba7dc5157b ("ice: Add support for XDP multi-buffer on Rx side")
> Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c | 61 +++++++++++--------
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.h | 1 -
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx_lib.h | 43 -------------
> 3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_txrx.c
...
> @@ -1139,23 +1136,27 @@ ice_put_rx_buf(struct ice_rx_ring *rx_ring, struct ice_rx_buf *rx_buf)
> * returned by XDP program;
> */
> static void ice_put_rx_mbuf(struct ice_rx_ring *rx_ring, struct xdp_buff *xdp,
> - u32 *xdp_xmit, u32 ntc)
> + u32 *xdp_xmit, u32 ntc, u32 verdict)
Hi Marciej,
Sorry, there is one more Kernel doc nit. As reported by the Kernel Test
Robot, verdict should be added to the Kernel doc for this function.
With that addressed feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists