[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ygnl622eexwagmxmsq5nrjk6owxr7tpdu4jd5cpkgkdnio6ekp@6jzpcwcsdnnm>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 12:07:17 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Luigi Leonardi <leonardi@...hat.com>
Cc: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
George Zhang <georgezhang@...are.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>, Andy King <acking@...are.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 3/6] vsock/test: Introduce vsock_bind()
On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 12:02:36PM +0100, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:11:30PM +0100, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>>On 1/22/25 17:01, Luigi Leonardi wrote:
>>>On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 03:44:04PM +0100, Michal Luczaj wrote:
>>>>Add a helper for socket()+bind(). Adapt callers.
>>>>
>>>>Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
>>>>Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
>>>>---
>>>>tools/testing/vsock/util.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>>>tools/testing/vsock/util.h | 1 +
>>>>tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 17 +-----------
>>>>3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>>diff --git a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
>>>>index 34e9dac0a105f8aeb8c9af379b080d5ce8cb2782..31ee1767c8b73c05cfd219c3d520a677df6e66a6 100644
>>>>--- a/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
>>>>+++ b/tools/testing/vsock/util.c
>>>>@@ -96,33 +96,42 @@ void vsock_wait_remote_close(int fd)
>>>> close(epollfd);
>>>>}
>>>>
>>>>-/* Bind to <bind_port>, connect to <cid, port> and return the file descriptor. */
>>>>-int vsock_bind_connect(unsigned int cid, unsigned int port, unsigned int bind_port, int type)
>>>
>>>If you need to send a v3, it would be nice to have a comment for
>>>vsock_bind, as there used to be one.
>>
>>Comment for vsock_bind_connect() remains, see below. As for vsock_bind(),
>>perhaps it's time to start using kernel-doc comments?
>This is a good idea! @Stefano WDYT?
I'm not sure it's worth it since they are just tests, but if someone
wants to do it, absolutely no objection.
Thanks,
Stefano
Powered by blists - more mailing lists