[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ca9e3821-b793-499c-8ae8-abc677adf375@roeck-us.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 07:41:18 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com, matt@...ostay.sg,
mchehab@...nel.org, irusskikh@...vell.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, louis.peens@...igine.com, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, kabel@...nel.org, alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com,
krzk@...nel.org, zhanjie9@...ilicon.com, zhenglifeng1@...wei.com,
liuyonglong@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/9] Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
On 1/24/25 07:08, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:26:26AM +0800, Huisong Li wrote:
>> The HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro is provided by hwmon.h and used widely by many
>> other drivers. This series use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code.
>>
>> Huisong Li (9):
>> media: video-i2c: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
>> net: aquantia: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
>> net: nfp: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
>> net: phy: marvell: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
>> net: phy: marvell10g: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
>> rtc: ab-eoz9: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
>> rtc: ds3232: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
>> w1: w1_therm: w1: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
>> net: phy: aquantia: Use HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO macro to simplify code
>
> Please split these patches per subsystem. Maintainers generally have
> scripts to accept patches, and those scripts don't work when there are
> patches for other Maintainers mixed in. So you need 4 patchsets,
> media, net, rtc and w1.
>
> I would also like to see the HWMON Maintainers opinion on these. A
> patchset containing these have already been NACKed once. These patches
> do however look like valid cleanups. But are they just so you can do
> something bad in your vendor tree, which will never make it to
> mainline?
>
I no longer comment on hwmon related changes outside drivers/hwmon/
unless there are blatant problems such as someone trying to use an obsolete
API or abusing the current API.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists