netdev - Re: [Patch net 2/4] Add test case to check for pfifo_tail

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z5WqCnOiSF72PGws@pop-os.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2025 19:20:42 -0800
From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jhs@...atatu.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
	quanglex97@...il.com, mincho@...ori.io,
	Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net 2/4] Add test case to check for pfifo_tail_enqueue()
 behaviour when limit == 0

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 11:37:43AM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:07:38PM -0800, Cong Wang wrote:
> > From: Quang Le <quanglex97@...il.com>
> > 
> > When limit == 0, pfifo_tail_enqueue() must drop new packet and
> > increase dropped packets count of scheduler.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Quang Le <quanglex97@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@...edance.com>
> 
> Hi Cong, all,
> 
> This test is reporting "not ok" in the Netdev CI.
> 
> # not ok 577 d774 - Check pfifo_head_drop qdisc enqueue behaviour when limit == 0
> # Could not match regex pattern. Verify command output:
> # qdisc pfifo_head_drop 1: root refcnt 2 limit 0p
> #  Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0)
> #  backlog 0b 0p requeues 0

Oops... It worked on my side, let me take a look.

Thanks for reporting!