[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250128084620.57547-13-kerneljasonxing@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 16:46:19 +0800
From: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com,
dsahern@...nel.org,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
willemb@...gle.com,
ast@...nel.org,
daniel@...earbox.net,
andrii@...nel.org,
martin.lau@...ux.dev,
eddyz87@...il.com,
song@...nel.org,
yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
kpsingh@...nel.org,
sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com,
jolsa@...nel.org,
horms@...nel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v7 12/13] net-timestamp: introduce cgroup lock to avoid affecting non-bpf cases
Introducing the lock to avoid affecting the applications which
are not using timestamping bpf feature.
Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
---
net/ipv4/tcp.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp.c b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
index b2f1fd216df1..a2ac57543b6d 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp.c
@@ -493,7 +493,8 @@ static void tcp_tx_timestamp(struct sock *sk, struct sockcm_cookie *sockc)
shinfo->tskey = TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq + skb->len - 1;
}
- if (SK_BPF_CB_FLAG_TEST(sk, SK_BPF_CB_TX_TIMESTAMPING) && skb) {
+ if (cgroup_bpf_enabled(CGROUP_SOCK_OPS) &&
+ SK_BPF_CB_FLAG_TEST(sk, SK_BPF_CB_TX_TIMESTAMPING) && skb) {
struct skb_shared_info *shinfo = skb_shinfo(skb);
struct tcp_skb_cb *tcb = TCP_SKB_CB(skb);
--
2.43.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists