[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa054892-b501-4e98-a8a5-6fc9acc68be5@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 20:14:25 +0100
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "sreedevi.joshi" <joshisre@...mtp.an.intel.com>
Cc: hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Sreedevi Joshi <sreedevi.joshi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] phy: fix null pointer issue in phy_attach_direct()
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:36:38PM -0600, sreedevi.joshi wrote:
> From: Sreedevi Joshi <sreedevi.joshi@...el.com>
>
> When attaching a fixed phy to devices like veth
Humm. Zoom out. What is the big picture? Why would a veth need a PHY?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists