[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250129120526.7ba0958b@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 12:05:26 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Anna Emese Nyiri <annaemesenyiri@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, fejes@....elte.hu, edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com, willemb@...gle.com, idosch@...sch.org,
davem@...emloft.net, horms@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] selftests: net: Add support for testing
SO_RCVMARK and SO_RCVPRIORITY
On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 15:36:01 +0100 Anna Emese Nyiri wrote:
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> index 73ee88d6b043..98f05473e672 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/Makefile
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ TEST_PROGS += gro.sh
> TEST_PROGS += gre_gso.sh
> TEST_PROGS += cmsg_so_mark.sh
> TEST_PROGS += cmsg_so_priority.sh
> +TEST_PROGS += test_so_rcv.sh
You need to add the C part to the TEST_GEN_PROGS, otherwise it won't
get built. We're seeing:
./test_so_rcv.sh: line 25: ./so_rcv_listener: No such file or directory
in the CI.
> + memset(&recv_addr, 0, sizeof(recv_addr));
> + recv_addr.sin_family = AF_INET;
> + recv_addr.sin_port = htons(atoi(opt.service));
> +
> + if (inet_pton(AF_INET, opt.host, &recv_addr.sin_addr) <= 0) {
> + perror("Invalid address");
> + ret_value = -errno;
> + goto cleanup;
> + }
Any reason not to use getaddrinfo() ?
Otherwise LGTM, thanks for following up!
--
pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists