netdev - Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] rust: Add read_poll

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250129.135314.187500982981537852.fujita.tomonori@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2025 13:53:14 +0900 (JST)
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@...il.com>
To: me@...enk.dev
Cc: fujita.tomonori@...il.com, gary@...yguo.net,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
 tmgross@...ch.edu, ojeda@...nel.org, alex.gaynor@...il.com,
 bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, benno.lossin@...ton.me, a.hindborg@...sung.com,
 aliceryhl@...gle.com, anna-maria@...utronix.de, frederic@...nel.org,
 tglx@...utronix.de, arnd@...db.de, jstultz@...gle.com, sboyd@...nel.org,
 mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
 vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
 bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, vschneid@...hat.com,
 tgunders@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 7/8] rust: Add read_poll_timeout functions

On Tue, 28 Jan 2025 11:49:48 +0100
Fiona Behrens <me@...enk.dev> wrote:

>> +#[track_caller]
>> +pub fn read_poll_timeout<Op, Cond, T: Copy>(
>> +    mut op: Op,
>> +    mut cond: Cond,
>> +    sleep_delta: Delta,
>> +    timeout_delta: Option<Delta>,
>> +) -> Result<T>
>> +where
>> +    Op: FnMut() -> Result<T>,
>> +    Cond: FnMut(&T) -> bool,
>> +{
>> +    let start = Instant::now();
>> +    let sleep = !sleep_delta.is_zero();
>> +
>> +    if sleep {
>> +        might_sleep(Location::caller());
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    loop {
>> +        let val = op()?;
>> +        if cond(&val) {
>> +            // Unlike the C version, we immediately return.
>> +            // We know the condition is met so we don't need to check again.
>> +            return Ok(val);
>> +        }
>> +        if let Some(timeout_delta) = timeout_delta {
>> +            if start.elapsed() > timeout_delta {
>> +                // Unlike the C version, we immediately return.
>> +                // We have just called `op()` so we don't need to call it again.
>> +                return Err(ETIMEDOUT);
>> +            }
>> +        }
>> +        if sleep {
>> +            fsleep(sleep_delta);
>> +        }
>> +        // fsleep() could be busy-wait loop so we always call cpu_relax().
>> +        cpu_relax();
>> +    }
>> +}
> 
> I wonder if it makes sense to then switch `Delta` to wrap a  `NonZeroI64` and forbid deltas with 0 nanoseconds with that and use the niche optimization. Not sure if we make other apis horrible by that, but this would prevent deltas that encode no time passing.

I think that there are valid use casese for a zero Delta type.

About this function, using zero Delta for sleep_delta means busy
polling. Sevaral drivers use the C version of this function in that
manner.

Using zero Delta for timeout_delta means checking a condition only
once.