lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250131192912.133796-2-ameryhung@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2025 11:28:40 -0800
From: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
	martin.lau@...nel.org,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
	cong.wang@...edance.com,
	jhs@...atatu.com,
	sinquersw@...il.com,
	toke@...hat.com,
	jiri@...nulli.us,
	stfomichev@...il.com,
	ekarani.silvestre@....ufcg.edu.br,
	yangpeihao@...u.edu.cn,
	yepeilin.cs@...il.com,
	ameryhung@...il.com,
	ming.lei@...hat.com,
	kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 01/18] bpf: Make every prog keep a copy of ctx_arg_info

Currently, ctx_arg_info is read-only in the view of the verifier since
it is shared among programs of the same attach type. Make each program
have their own copy of ctx_arg_info so that we can use it to store
program specific information.

In the next patch where we support acquiring a referenced kptr through a
struct_ops argument tagged with "__ref", ctx_arg_info->ref_obj_id will
be used to store the unique reference object id of the argument. This
avoids creating a requirement in the verifier that "__ref" tagged
arguments must be the first set of references acquired [0].

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20241220195619.2022866-2-amery.hung@gmail.com/

Signed-off-by: Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h   |  7 +++++--
 kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c | 13 ++++++-------
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index f3f50e29d639..f4df39e8c735 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1507,7 +1507,7 @@ struct bpf_prog_aux {
 	u32 max_rdonly_access;
 	u32 max_rdwr_access;
 	struct btf *attach_btf;
-	const struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux *ctx_arg_info;
+	struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux *ctx_arg_info;
 	void __percpu *priv_stack_ptr;
 	struct mutex dst_mutex; /* protects dst_* pointers below, *after* prog becomes visible */
 	struct bpf_prog *dst_prog;
@@ -1945,6 +1945,9 @@ static inline void bpf_struct_ops_desc_release(struct bpf_struct_ops_desc *st_op
 
 #endif
 
+int bpf_prog_ctx_arg_info_init(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+			       const struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux *info, u32 cnt);
+
 #if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF) && defined(CONFIG_BPF_LSM)
 int bpf_trampoline_link_cgroup_shim(struct bpf_prog *prog,
 				    int cgroup_atype);
@@ -2546,7 +2549,7 @@ struct bpf_iter__bpf_map_elem {
 
 int bpf_iter_reg_target(const struct bpf_iter_reg *reg_info);
 void bpf_iter_unreg_target(const struct bpf_iter_reg *reg_info);
-bool bpf_iter_prog_supported(struct bpf_prog *prog);
+int bpf_iter_prog_supported(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 const struct bpf_func_proto *
 bpf_iter_get_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog);
 int bpf_iter_link_attach(const union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, struct bpf_prog *prog);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
index 106735145948..380e9a7cac75 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ static void cache_btf_id(struct bpf_iter_target_info *tinfo,
 	tinfo->btf_id = prog->aux->attach_btf_id;
 }
 
-bool bpf_iter_prog_supported(struct bpf_prog *prog)
+int bpf_iter_prog_supported(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
 	const char *attach_fname = prog->aux->attach_func_name;
 	struct bpf_iter_target_info *tinfo = NULL, *iter;
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ bool bpf_iter_prog_supported(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	int prefix_len = strlen(prefix);
 
 	if (strncmp(attach_fname, prefix, prefix_len))
-		return false;
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	mutex_lock(&targets_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(iter, &targets, list) {
@@ -360,12 +360,11 @@ bool bpf_iter_prog_supported(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	}
 	mutex_unlock(&targets_mutex);
 
-	if (tinfo) {
-		prog->aux->ctx_arg_info_size = tinfo->reg_info->ctx_arg_info_size;
-		prog->aux->ctx_arg_info = tinfo->reg_info->ctx_arg_info;
-	}
+	if (!tinfo)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
-	return tinfo != NULL;
+	return bpf_prog_ctx_arg_info_init(prog, tinfo->reg_info->ctx_arg_info,
+					  tinfo->reg_info->ctx_arg_info_size);
 }
 
 const struct bpf_func_proto *
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 9971c03adfd5..a41ba019780f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -22377,6 +22377,18 @@ static void print_verification_stats(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		env->peak_states, env->longest_mark_read_walk);
 }
 
+int bpf_prog_ctx_arg_info_init(struct bpf_prog *prog,
+			       const struct bpf_ctx_arg_aux *info, u32 cnt)
+{
+	prog->aux->ctx_arg_info = kcalloc(cnt, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!prog->aux->ctx_arg_info)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	memcpy(prog->aux->ctx_arg_info, info, sizeof(*info) * cnt);
+	prog->aux->ctx_arg_info_size = cnt;
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 {
 	const struct btf_type *t, *func_proto;
@@ -22457,17 +22469,12 @@ static int check_struct_ops_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 
-	/* btf_ctx_access() used this to provide argument type info */
-	prog->aux->ctx_arg_info =
-		st_ops_desc->arg_info[member_idx].info;
-	prog->aux->ctx_arg_info_size =
-		st_ops_desc->arg_info[member_idx].cnt;
-
 	prog->aux->attach_func_proto = func_proto;
 	prog->aux->attach_func_name = mname;
 	env->ops = st_ops->verifier_ops;
 
-	return 0;
+	return bpf_prog_ctx_arg_info_init(prog, st_ops_desc->arg_info[member_idx].info,
+					  st_ops_desc->arg_info[member_idx].cnt);
 }
 #define SECURITY_PREFIX "security_"
 
@@ -22917,9 +22924,7 @@ static int check_attach_btf_id(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
 		prog->aux->attach_btf_trace = true;
 		return 0;
 	} else if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_TRACE_ITER) {
-		if (!bpf_iter_prog_supported(prog))
-			return -EINVAL;
-		return 0;
+		return bpf_iter_prog_supported(prog);
 	}
 
 	if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
-- 
2.47.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ