[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3b3e0cdf-9c2b-4423-b638-0a79b238eb93@linux.dev>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 15:14:42 -0800
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>
To: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, dsahern@...nel.org, willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
willemb@...gle.com, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, andrii@...nel.org,
eddyz87@...il.com, song@...nel.org, yonghong.song@...ux.dev,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org, sdf@...ichev.me,
haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org, horms@...nel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v7 05/13] net-timestamp: prepare for isolating
two modes of SO_TIMESTAMPING
On 1/28/25 12:46 AM, Jason Xing wrote:
> No functional changes here. I add skb_enable_app_tstamp() to test
> if the orig_skb matches the usage of application SO_TIMESTAMPING
> and skb_sw_tstamp_tx() to distinguish the software and hardware
There is no skb_sw_tstamp_tx() in the code. An outdated commit message?
> timestamp when tsflag is SCM_TSTAMP_SND.
>
> Also, I deliberately distinguish the the software and hardware
> SCM_TSTAMP_SND timestamp by passing 'sw' parameter in order to
> avoid such a case where hardware may go wrong and pass a NULL
> hwstamps, which is even though unlikely to happen. If it really
> happens, bpf prog will finally consider it as a software timestamp.
> It will be hardly recognized. Let's make the timestamping part
> more robust.
>
> After this patch, I will soon add checks about bpf SO_TIMESTAMPING.
This needs to be updated also. BPF does not use the SO_TIMESTAMPING socket option.
> In this way, we can support two modes parallelly.
s/parallely/in parallel/
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/skbuff.h | 13 +++++++------
> net/core/dev.c | 2 +-
> net/core/skbuff.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 3 ++-
> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> index bb2b751d274a..dfc419281cc9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
> +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> #include <net/net_debug.h>
> #include <net/dropreason-core.h>
> #include <net/netmem.h>
> +#include <uapi/linux/errqueue.h>
>
> /**
> * DOC: skb checksums
> @@ -4533,18 +4534,18 @@ void skb_complete_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> void __skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb, const struct sk_buff *ack_skb,
> struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps,
> - struct sock *sk, int tstype);
> + struct sock *sk, bool sw, int tstype);
>
> /**
> - * skb_tstamp_tx - queue clone of skb with send time stamps
> + * skb_tstamp_tx - queue clone of skb with send HARDWARE timestamps
> * @orig_skb: the original outgoing packet
> * @hwtstamps: hardware time stamps, may be NULL if not available
> *
> * If the skb has a socket associated, then this function clones the
> * skb (thus sharing the actual data and optional structures), stores
> - * the optional hardware time stamping information (if non NULL) or
> - * generates a software time stamp (otherwise), then queues the clone
This line is removed. Does it mean no software timestamp now after this change?
> - * to the error queue of the socket. Errors are silently ignored.
> + * the optional hardware time stamping information (if non NULL) then
> + * queues the clone to the error queue of the socket. Errors are
> + * silently ignored.
> */
> void skb_tstamp_tx(struct sk_buff *orig_skb,
> struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *hwtstamps);
> @@ -4565,7 +4566,7 @@ static inline void skb_tx_timestamp(struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> skb_clone_tx_timestamp(skb);
> if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags & SKBTX_SW_TSTAMP)
> - skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL);
> + __skb_tstamp_tx(skb, NULL, NULL, skb->sk, true, SCM_TSTAMP_SND);
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists