[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z6CR6QGVrMqauP2H@hog>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2025 10:52:41 +0100
From: Sabrina Dubroca <sd@...asysnail.net>
To: Antonio Quartulli <antonio@...nvpn.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@...il.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, ryazanov.s.a@...il.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, Xiao Liang <shaw.leon@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v18 07/25] ovpn: implement basic TX path (UDP)
2025-01-13, 10:31:26 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> +static void ovpn_encrypt_post(struct sk_buff *skb, int ret)
> +{
> + struct ovpn_peer *peer = ovpn_skb_cb(skb)->peer;
> +
> + if (unlikely(ret < 0))
> + goto err;
> +
> + skb_mark_not_on_list(skb);
> +
> + switch (peer->sock->sock->sk->sk_protocol) {
We have a ref on the peer, but not on the ovpn_sock. DEL_PEER could
have detached the sock by the time the crypto completes.
(unfortunately I don't have any idea to fix this yet)
> + case IPPROTO_UDP:
> + ovpn_udp_send_skb(peer, skb);
> + break;
> + default:
> + /* no transport configured yet */
> + goto err;
> + }
> + /* skb passed down the stack - don't free it */
> + skb = NULL;
> +err:
> + if (unlikely(skb))
> + dev_core_stats_tx_dropped_inc(peer->ovpn->dev);
> + ovpn_peer_put(peer);
> + kfree_skb(skb);
> +}
--
Sabrina
Powered by blists - more mailing lists