netdev - Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/3] vxlan: vxlan_rcv(): Update comment to inlucde ipv6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z6ISkVTHtknDTPGn@t-dallas>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 21:13:53 +0800
From: Ted Chen <znscnchen@...il.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 3/3] vxlan: vxlan_rcv(): Update comment to
 inlucde ipv6

On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 02:09:23PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 07:34:22PM +0800, Ted Chen wrote:
> > Update the comment to indicate that both ipv4/udp.c and ipv6/udp.c invoke
> 
> Nit: net/ipv4/udp.c and net/ipv6/udp.c
> 
> > vxlan_rcv() to process packets.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ted Chen <znscnchen@...il.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > index 5ef40ac816cc..8bdf91d1fdfe 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/vxlan/vxlan_core.c
> > @@ -1684,7 +1684,7 @@ static bool vxlan_ecn_decapsulate(struct vxlan_sock *vs, void *oiph,
> >  	return err <= 1;
> >  }
> >  
> > -/* Callback from net/ipv4/udp.c to receive packets */
> > +/* Callback from net/ipv{4,6}/udp.c to receive packets */
> 
> Maybe just remove the comment? I don't see how anyone can find it
> useful.
I'm ok with either way.
Please let me know if I need to send a separate one or the current one
is fine.
 
> Regardless, please submit this patch separately as it's not related to
> the other patches in the series.
I came across this comment when I wrote this series as I found vxlan_rcv()
is called for both IPV4 and IPV6. Besides, I saw vxlan_err_lookup() has a
similar comment.

 
> >  static int vxlan_rcv(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
> >  {
> >  	struct vxlan_vni_node *vninode = NULL;
> > -- 
> > 2.39.2
> > 
> >