netdev - RE: KSZ9477 HSR Offloading

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <BL0PR11MB2913ECAA6F0C97E342F7DE22E7F42@BL0PR11MB2913.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2025 14:55:51 +0000
From: <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To: <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>, <lukma@...x.de>, <andrew@...n.ch>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>
Subject: RE: KSZ9477 HSR Offloading

Hi Jakub,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 3, 2025 6:04 PM
> To: Woojung Huh - C21699 <Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
> Cc: frieder.schrempf@...tron.de; lukma@...x.de; andrew@...n.ch;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; Tristram Ha - C24268 <Tristram.Ha@...rochip.com>
> Subject: Re: KSZ9477 HSR Offloading
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
> 
> On Mon, 3 Feb 2025 14:58:12 +0000 Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com wrote:
> > Hi Lukasz & Frieder,
> >
> > Oops! My bad. I confused that Lukasz was filed a case originally. Monday
> brain-freeze. :(
> >
> > Yes, it is not a public link and per-user case. So, only Frieder can see
> it.
> > It may be able for you when Frieder adds you as a team. (Not tested
> personally though)
> 
> Woojung Huh, please make sure the mailing list is informed about
> the outcomes. Taking discussion off list to a closed ticketing
> system is against community rules. See below, thanks.
> 
> Quoting documentation:
> 
>   Open development
>   ----------------
> 
>   Discussions about user reported issues, and development of new code
>   should be conducted in a manner typical for the larger subsystem.
>   It is common for development within a single company to be conducted
>   behind closed doors. However, development and discussions initiated
>   by community members must not be redirected from public to closed forums
>   or to private email conversations. Reasonable exceptions to this guidance
>   include discussions about security related issues.
> 
> See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/maintainer/feature-and-driver-
> maintainers.html#open-development

Learn new thing today. Didn't know this. Definitely I will share it
when this work is done. My intention was for easier work for request than
having me as an middleman for the issue.

Best regards,
Woojung